Skip to main content

He is so stupid

http://www.edofolks.com/html/pub168.htm


Greetings, Peace,and Power,
 
As a International Attorney preparing the case for slave reparations and Crimes Against humanity, I am wondering what African people will think as we name the Vatican as one of the first defendants? After all many of the Africans in America and Africa are Catholic. In fact, I was a Catholic until reading Lerone Bennet's "Before the Mayflower", when I was in College. Most of my family is Christian, and now I am about to sue the Catholics, Baptists, Protestants, etc.for  the Papal Bulls and the churches  mis-interpretations of the story of Ham that said that Africans would be the servants of the Europeans forever.
 
Did the Pope start the psychology of racism, and non-human treatment? Yes, the Papal Bull Romanus Pontifex 1455 was directed towards the Guineans (Africans) and especially the Muslims because the African Muslim Tarik conquered Spain in  800.  
 
The additional basis was the assault against the African-Indians (The Indians in America are an African-Asian admixture)
 
In the Papal Bull, lnter Caetera of May 3, 1493, Pope Alexander VI, effectively granted the world to Spain to overthrow "barbarous [Indian] nations" so that the "heathen could be drawn to embrace the Catholic faith and be trained in good morals." This Papal Bull, and a few others that followed, formed the legal and political foundation for the stealing of the Americas from our indigenous nations and the slaughter of our ancestors who would not Convert to christianity.
 
Consequently, as a precursor to this suit or negotiations, we wish that the Africans study these Papal Bulls, and the Doctrine of Ham and how they changed the world so you will not think that it is we who are at fault for our pursuit of Justice.
 
 
Dr. Mustafa Ansari
Chief Justice
Indigenous African American Reparations Tribunal
www.aareparations.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Newspaper coverage of the scams #1

This goes to proclivity and note, he would not shut down the illegal "Law Firm", he would merely change his location and the name.  Note as well, that this has been going on since the 1980s when he tells you he was in law school.  He had no supervising attorney and the record reflects he was warned to close those clinics.  Practicing law without a license is illegal.  It's as illegal as he is now, with his fake "American Human Rights Institute".  When I outed him in 2011 and early 2012, he first said in a Facebook group, he was a "Political Prisoner". WOW! We were able to show the INSTITUTE was a FRAUD, then the fake attempt to defame my name came. We were able to go to Google Earth and see this.  Friends then went to the surrounding buildings for the mail drop and accessed pictures of him going to the drop and leaving.  He then changed the so-called "location" to Stone Mountain.  Yet another mail drop.  All you have to do is go to Google E...

A snitch is a snitch is a snitch Michael Perkins

The beginning of the Fraud-Back to the Future 1986

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1842904.html  AARTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CROCKER NATIONAL BANK, et al., Defendants and Respondents. H000601. Decided: April 11, 1986   James J. Reilly, San Francisco, Paul J. Slavit, Wilson & Slavit, Oakland, for plaintiff and appellant.  Mary Lynne Thaxter, Hoge, Fenton, Jones & Appel, Inc., San Jose, for defendants and respondents .IIn this case we determine that defendants Crocker Bank and its employees are not liable for wrongful dishonor of checks drawn against an account when the bank complies with its account agreement when faced with conflicting demands by the signatories on the account.   We accordingly affirm the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants.IIScope of Review Since a summary judgment motion raises only questions of law regarding the construction and effect of the supporting and opposing papers, we independently review them on appeal, applying the same th...