Skip to main content

The Questions asked he never answers

Name one judge you taught. Provide the proof you are an International Attorney. I am one and you are not a member of the International Bar!

You have lied about your books!

Name these: law school from which you graduated and New School as you know was shut down and all certificates and degrees declared invalid.

2. What state do you hold a Bar card and pay dues

3. Most importantly, the Entity number you should have for your "Institute"

4.ISBN for the books you claimed to have written.

5. Tell the good people here how you earn money and where?

6. When did you attend either Georgetown or Harvard

I detest with a passion those who rip off our people in the name of changing our plight for the better. If you cared about these people, and your criminal history says otherwise, you would help, not harm them and above all, not take them for money courses you are not qualified to teach.

It's your MO to call folk Negroes, Sambos, Crazy, Agents, etc, as long as you deflect you continue to not answer the people who need to know who you are if you are taking their money.

Since 2002 you have had one fraud after another and many of us trusted you because we could not conceive that one who purported to care about our plight, did not. We waited and waited for your "scholars, lawyers, anthropologists", etc who would prove your thesis that we are indigenous to the Americas and we are NOT. But never have you named one authority. Now you are attempting to play in my arena by saying celebrities are donating money for you to offer scholarships for your phones classes! I know many of them and they are funders of my NGO and non profits! No one knows you or ever heard of you!

The International Bar is investigating as are officials from the U.K. To California to Georgia! Each time you took money from your victims, you committed either wire or mail fraud!

It's wrong! And you have the unmitigated (keep up, know you can't spell or pronounce words) gall to say "too late". You have taken many but advising anyone of note, NO.

Ansari you do not play with my people. You do not take their hard earned money because you cannot get or even keep a job. Running cons is all you know to do. Rip off white folk! But not our people!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_College_of_California_School_of_Law

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Newspaper coverage of the scams #1

This goes to proclivity and note, he would not shut down the illegal "Law Firm", he would merely change his location and the name.  Note as well, that this has been going on since the 1980s when he tells you he was in law school.  He had no supervising attorney and the record reflects he was warned to close those clinics.  Practicing law without a license is illegal.  It's as illegal as he is now, with his fake "American Human Rights Institute".  When I outed him in 2011 and early 2012, he first said in a Facebook group, he was a "Political Prisoner". WOW! We were able to show the INSTITUTE was a FRAUD, then the fake attempt to defame my name came. We were able to go to Google Earth and see this.  Friends then went to the surrounding buildings for the mail drop and accessed pictures of him going to the drop and leaving.  He then changed the so-called "location" to Stone Mountain.  Yet another mail drop.  All you have to do is go to Google E...

A snitch is a snitch is a snitch Michael Perkins

The beginning of the Fraud-Back to the Future 1986

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1842904.html  AARTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CROCKER NATIONAL BANK, et al., Defendants and Respondents. H000601. Decided: April 11, 1986   James J. Reilly, San Francisco, Paul J. Slavit, Wilson & Slavit, Oakland, for plaintiff and appellant.  Mary Lynne Thaxter, Hoge, Fenton, Jones & Appel, Inc., San Jose, for defendants and respondents .IIn this case we determine that defendants Crocker Bank and its employees are not liable for wrongful dishonor of checks drawn against an account when the bank complies with its account agreement when faced with conflicting demands by the signatories on the account.   We accordingly affirm the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants.IIScope of Review Since a summary judgment motion raises only questions of law regarding the construction and effect of the supporting and opposing papers, we independently review them on appeal, applying the same th...